On Mon 21-Feb-2011 at 14:52 -0800, Bill Sherman wrote:
Perhaps a ray of hope: if one could prevent (or delete) control points from being generated in featureless images, then those portion of the images that have pre-set pitch & yaw would -- I presume! -- be calculated relative to whatever image is set as the position anchor? (and thus basically fit with the rest of the images).
Usually the anchor needs to move around some to get everything level.
If you try a very recent snapshot, the built in control point generator is very good and gets many less 'false' control points.
Thinking about all this has led me to yet another question regarding the setting of pitch and yaw values to "place" a featureless image: is there an implied "distance" value applied to the pitch & yaw? I.e. pitch and yaw values without some distance from a viewing location don't fully specify the relationship between images -- right?
The roll, pitch and yaw values define the location relative to the centre of the output panorama.
-- Bruno -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
