On 31 March 2011 09:59, Jeffrey Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > It is a GOOD IDEA :-) > > i can't help thinking that all this debating, the feature could have been > built by now ;-))) (not by me though) > (not an excuse to simply build features instead of having a good debate, i > fully realize.) > > Jeffrey
Yeah, but it would have been of mediocre quality at best. RAW processing is out of scope of hugin and if it was implemented it would be something as simple as using dcraw to load an image. Nobody (hyperbole) uses dcraw to process their RAWs, because it's too simple to be useful alone. We couldn't compete with applications like Lightroom, Aperture or Rawtherapee. It would probably take a few man years to get there. Lukas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
