On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:01:47 +1000, Terry Duell <tdu...@iinet.net.au>
wrote:
I'll have a bit more of play with with the images and if I turn up
anything useful I'll post the story.
I have managed to get a result, using the low res images. It may be
possible to do better using higher res images. Here is the process I used.
Load images, using 'Assistant' tab.
'Images' tab, create control points.
'Optimizer' tab, optimize 'Positions (incremental, starting from anchor)'.
'Control Points' tab, manually delete control points with a distance
greater than about 8 or 9.
'Optimizer' tab, optimize 'Positions (incremental, starting from anchor)'.
These steps got me to a point where the max error was 8.1.
If I tried to optimize other parameters things just got worse, so I left
it at that.
In Fast Preview window select 'Projection' 'Rectilinear'; fiddle with
field of view sliders to reasonably fill the window.
'Stitcher' tab, deselect any Panorama outputs and select 'Remapped Images:
Exposure corrected...'; select 'Calculate Optimal Size', and then 'Stitch'.
I ended up with 3 remapped images, each 2458x2778 which look like they
would register OK.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and
other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
