Hullo Kay, On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:43:29 +1100, kfj <[email protected]> wrote:
[snip]
Just a wild idea here: Since you have a blur kernel, you might apply it to the sharp image and calculate the CPs between the 'naturally' blurred and 'artificially' blurred image. They might match better - both having been 'spoiled' once, rather than one good one and one that has undergone two filters - the motion blur and the deblur. Once the match it's optimized, you could switch to the deblurred/sharp pair. Also, local comparison of the artificially blurred and the naturally blurred image could give you feedback on the quality of your blur kernel so you could iterate if necessary.
OK, that's an interesting idea. Thanks. Cheers, -- Regards, Terry Duell -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
