Not to be a jerk, but this is not necessarily true. install autopano giga and render some panos. feel the speed :)
Of course this functionality does have a price - the price of some brilliant people working their asses off. And Multiblend is only at the beginning. And I don't want to trivialize what David has already built - I think it is a really great accomplishment, and I applaud him for it. Nevertheless, let's not set the bar too low, ok? :) On Friday, January 6, 2012 12:02:17 AM UTC+1, Stefan wrote: > > Hi guys > > I hate to be a jerk, but surely you realize that functionality has a price? > > If you force David to implement all the features you are used to get > from enblend, I'm quite sure that the performance of multiblend will be > in the ballpark of enblend for the same job. However, in order to get > there, quite some work has to be put into the development of multiblend. > > Wouldn't it be more efficient to use multiblend for 'fast prototyping' > of a pano and invest part of the effort currently put into extending the > functionality of multiblend into other tasks at hand? > > > Just my 2 cents ... > > Stefan > > -- > In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In > practice there is. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
