On 12/17/2012 12:51 AM, paul womack wrote:
JohnPW wrote:
This is very cool (and, amazingly, I've gotten it to work form me.)
I'm still trying to figure out how to run the perl script, but I'm
happy I at least have the commands working on the command line!
Any way, I'm curious, does this script produce essentially the same
results as if you output differently exposed tiffs converted from a
RAW file, or would that technique offer a slightly better result? I
ask out of curiosity (I don't normally have access to a camera that
shoots RAW.)
RAW should (potentially) have a little more data available than a JPEG,
so the results
from that should be (slightly) better.
48-bit RAW has 16-bits per color channel. JPG only has 8.
--
Gnome Nomad
[email protected]
wandering the landscape of god
http://www.clanjones.org/david/
http://dancing-treefrog.deviantart.com/
http://www.cafepress.com/otherend/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and
other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
