Yes, you are right, I didn't look closely enough. The details in the T shirt are more immediately visible, but the textures in the lightest zones now seem uniformly white. In my experience, P&S cameras have a tendency to over-expose pictures. Maybe choosing picture with a better exposition (that is under-exposed by the camera's standards) would give better results.
2012/12/18 JohnPW <[email protected]> > Are you sure you didn't mix the two up? > o1 is the original and o2 is the output. > In my opinion the shirt detail in o2 is very clearly blown out compared to > o1. > BTW, I agree that it's best to compare o1 and o2. I included c100 to show > that at least one of the intermediate image isn't blown out at Bugbear > wondered. > > > On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 3:37:17 PM UTC-6, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: >> >> Hello JohnPW >> >> IMO, you shouldn't compare the highlights between any image and c100: >> since c100 is the darkest, it will always show more details in the >> highlights than any other picture. You should always compare with the >> original. Does o2 do better than à1 in the T shirt? I believe so. >> >> -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
