Are you sure you didn't mix the two up? o1 is the original and o2 is the output. In my opinion the shirt detail in o2 is very clearly blown out compared to o1. BTW, I agree that it's best to compare o1 and o2. I included c100 to show that at least one of the intermediate image isn't blown out at Bugbear wondered.
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 3:37:17 PM UTC-6, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > > Hello JohnPW > > IMO, you shouldn't compare the highlights between any image and c100: > since c100 is the darkest, it will always show more details in the > highlights than any other picture. You should always compare with the > original. Does o2 do better than à1 in the T shirt? I believe so. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
