Carl, thank you very, very much for your answer. Could you please or anybody look at the DIFFERENT panorama below.
On Monday, 25 November 2013 22:24:51 UTC, zarl wrote: > > Hi Pawel, > > in the Advanced interface try to reset the photometric parameters to the > original EXIF values. Use the context menu (right mouse click). > > I haven't tried this yet because I am going to work right now, however I tried to find this options and I couldn't. I will try harder when I come back home. > The panorama is extremely oversaturated and I guess that's part of how > you process your raw images. > > I do not think so. If you look at the panorama: http://www.rozenek.com/images/forum/panorama-ok.jpg - this is panorama made with Hugin 2013 and all is perfect! The same components used in Hugin 2013 gives me a awful result here: http://www.rozenek.com/images/forum/panorama-bad.jpg You can look at two random frames (components) which I used to make these panoramas, I would like to say again: for both I used the same components made in HDR-MACCHINERY software. http://www.rozenek.com/images/forum/frame-01.jpg http://www.rozenek.com/images/forum/frame-02.jpg > The zenith and nadir are missing. If you didn't shoot images for both > you might be able to either patch those areas it in your image editor, > or just set the viewing limits in pano2vr. Pano2vr has a cool feature to > excerpt those regions so you can easily edit them. Look for the "Patch" > video tutorial. > > Yes, the previous panorama had a problem with zenith and nadir because it was only a test shot. The today's panorama has no problem with zenith and still isn't ok with nadir - however I am not too fussy yet :) > > Interestingly the area around your tripod doesn't look that bad, so the > set up wasn't that bad. BTW it's not a "nodal point", see > http://wiki.panotools.org/Nodal_Point<http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.panotools.org%2FNodal_Point&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHrlDpgxnINGb7bncR4VuphFAlmWQ> > > > I made my bracket myselt just for my camera: http://www.rozenek.com/images/forum/bracket.jpg > Cheers, > Carl > > Pawel Rozenek schrieb am 23.11.13 19:41: > > Hi All, > > > > I have done about 20...30 360x180 panoramas in my life. I was always > > using Hugin 2012 version. Last night I tried to use a different lens and > > I had a problem with stitching all the pictures together (possibly the > > nodal point was not very well adjusted). Anyway, looking for help in > > internet I found that Hugin 2013 has recently been released so I > > downloaded and installed this version. To my surprise Hugin 2013 > > stitched all my 36 pictures without any problems! > > > > > > Unfortunately the final panorama picture is very light, no contrast, > > very poor saturation whereas ALL MY component pictures ale quite nice > > and intense. > > > > What wrong I have done? > > > > My panorama and a few example pictures are here: > > http://www.rozenek.com/english,1147<http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rozenek.com%2Fenglish%2C1147&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNEDWn3dYyUPVI2cdivvg0z5ksrFvQ> > > > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/d653dca9-656a-48e6-9fde-379bc5cc73db%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
