On Tuesday, 26 November 2013 12:56:57 UTC, Frédéric COIFFIER wrote: > > > Have you tried the enblend option --no-ciecam ? > https://bugs.launchpad.net/enblend/+bug/1157155 > > At the risk of "me tooing" - many thanks from me too! I had spent maybe 6 hours trying to get my panorama to work. For some reason the first pano I did with this set of images was OK (but not aligned properly) - then after that I would get exactly the problem described here, except when I used a subset of the full set of photos.
I see there's a post saying using the profile is correct, and this isn't a bug. However, if so then the preview in Hugin should also use, as otherwise it's totally misleading. Also, I find it really odd that the problem only shows up on the full panorama - not when I process a subset. All images were processed in exactly the same way (from Canon EOS 60D, RAW processed using DPP, no changes in the area of colour management as far as I can remember). I'd imagine that this would trip up a reasonable number of people - even if it's not a bug as such, I would have thought it better/safer to use --no-ciecam by default, and let advanced users change this (though I'm a new Hugin user, so my opinion may be worthless!). - Danny -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/1f4a297a-e7ee-4b92-8538-7861493f5f19%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
