On 03/21/2014 05:59 AM, Terry Duell wrote: > Hello Vladimir, > > On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:34:08 +1100, Vladimir Nadvornik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > [snip] > >> Now, when I process it as "Exposure fused from any arrangement", then >> there are no burned out areas, but the extra image is still recognizable >> as a darker rectangle, which does not look good. >> > > Is this "does not look good" in the Fast Panorama preview, or the saved > stitch? >
the saved stitch >> With "Exposure corrected" it does not consider overexposures at all >> and part of the overexposed area are just grey in the result. >> > > Are you selecting an image with good exposure as your anchor for exposure? > actually no. Does it have any effect on overexposure detection? Vladimir -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/532C0AEF.1000002%40suse.cz. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
