Hi All, I have just received an answer from John Houghton, for a strange reasons he couldn't post the message to this group. He prepared an animated gif here: http://ge.tt/1vEx1Wk1/v/0?c proofing the nodal point should have been improved. I am still very surprised that such a small imperfection could cause so big problem on objects which are quite far away - but, I have got proof so I can;t argue with optic rules :)
Thank you all again. Pawel Rozenek -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/9b517c4c-862b-46fb-b9a7-831d3f1353e5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
