On Sun 15-Jun-2014 at 00:56 -0700, Pawel Rozenek wrote:
I have just received an answer from John Houghton, for a strange reasons he
couldn't post the message to this group. He prepared an animated gif here:
http://ge.tt/1vEx1Wk1/v/0?c proofing the nodal point should have been
improved.
I'm not sure why John couldn't post this, it hasn't been 'held' for
moderation by googlegroups.
I am still very surprised that such a small imperfection could cause so big
problem on objects which are quite far away - but, I have got proof so I
can;t argue with optic rules :)
It looks to me that your parallax point is out by 10-20mm.
--
Bruno
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/20140615225255.GC2402%40postle.net.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
