Hi Guys,

 

I know what was wrong with my panorama!!! :)

 

Autofocus caused the problem. When it slightly changes the distance, also it 
slightly changes the magnification :)

 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of panostar
Sent: 15 June 2014 08:18
To: [email protected]
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Can I automatically improve stitching?

 

Pawel, Your images stitch quite well, though some evidence of parallax problems 
can be seen.  See this animated gif: http://ge.tt/1vEx1Wk1/v/0?c .  This 
indicates that the setup of your panorama head could be improved.

 

While a good stitch was obtained using all the supplied images, half of them 
can be discarded as the remainder have adequate overlap.  There's a 6000x3000 
jpeg at http://ge.tt/4lsO3Uk1 made from 18 images .  Actually, I did this with 
PTGui, but Hugin should give a similar result, given the same amount of care in 
the assignment of control points etc.

 

John

 



On Saturday, June 14, 2014 10:26:00 AM UTC+1, Pawel Rozenek wrote:

Hi Daniel,

 

I really apologise -I missed your email.

 

I uploaded my panorama files together with hugin files here: 
http://www.rozenek.com/temp/panorama.zip (300MB)

 

If you have a spare time - you can look at this. But please note this is not a 
very important panorama for me. I just got the problem and I try to understand 
why. 

Possibly you all have a right - my nodal point was not perfect. I just do not 
understand why it affected so far parts of the picture :)

 

Thank you Daniel and everybody who tried to help.

 

Pawel Rozenek



On Monday, 9 June 2014 00:33:13 UTC+1, dkloi wrote:

It could be that your no-parallax-point is not set correctly but more likely is 
that your workflow in setting the control points and optimising the geometry is 
the real issue. I once took a whole batch of panos with the NPP 10mm offset to 
the right (I forgot I'd omitted the camera mounting plate on the NN3MkII when 
taking them) but was still able to salvage the final spherical panoramas by a 
lot of tweaking of the control points and arcane trickery, 
https://www.360cities.net/image/glasgow-science-centre-dusk was one of them. If 
you could post the source imagery, I could try stitching it in Hugin to see if 
there are problems with the geometry.

 

Daniel.

On Sunday, 8 June 2014 15:50:30 UTC+1, Pawel Rozenek wrote:

Hi John,

 

Thank you for your reply. Well, this panorama is only a example and ONLY one 
reason why I posted my question here was I' like to inform the owner of the 
Hugin software about possible problem. However, if anybody says it is my nodal 
point problem - I do not blame Hugin than :) Thank you :)

On Saturday, 7 June 2014 19:46:05 UTC+1, panostar wrote:

There are dozens of stitching errors in the Norwich panorama, both at the 
horizontal level and the zenith.  It's possible that the zenith errors, despite 
being further away, are not unconnected with the efforts made to align the 
images lower down.  If you care to make a set of images available (half size 
jpegs would do), maybe we could give a more informed opinion about what's going 
on.

 

John

On Saturday, June 7, 2014 9:54:52 AM UTC+1, Pawel Rozenek wrote:

Hi Guys,

 

A few months ago we had a conversation about a stitching problem in my panorama.

The print screen from my panorama is here:

http://www.rozenek.com/images/forum/hugin-problem.jpg

and the panorama is here: 
http://www.rozenek.com/royal-arcade-norwich-panorama-360-x-180/

 

Despite having a proper u-bracket for my camera we have found that the problem 
was created by a ball head in my tripod which was not in a perfect vertical 
position.

IT WAS FAIR ENOUGH :) so I assumed it was my fault and that's all :)

 

However, just a few days I realised (my brain works slowly :P ) that the 
parallax error appears on the roof, near the zenith point (see link). Zenith is 
miles away from my tripod so I would like to raise the question again - how is 
it possible that the not perfect nodal point affects zenith?

 

I am not saying you were not right. I just do not get it why not perfect nodal 
point affects zenith!

 

Any clues? :)

And thank you again.

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/hugin-ptx/neh7DKLYD7g/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
[email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/48751a91-6ab9-495a-94b0-8cd847bc6543%40googlegroups.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/48751a91-6ab9-495a-94b0-8cd847bc6543%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/001201cf9df2%2464fbe530%242ef3af90%24%40googlemail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to