Thank you very much. I was working toward what seems an impossible end. Disregarding the difference in the numbers, I was finally able to arrive at the proper corrections for the 16 and 20mm focal lengths for the zoom lens I'm testing. Thank you very much for your help and kindness.
Best regards, Robert Lounsberry On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Torsten Bronger < bron...@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > Hallöchen! > > Robert Lounsberry writes: > > > [...] Is that a realistic goal? To be able to get close to those > > numbers? > > Even without having looked at the video yet I can say: No. Very > different coefficients can yield rather similar functions in the > respective interval. The actual question is whether your > coefficients lead to a good-looking correction. > > Tschö, > Torsten. > > -- > Torsten Bronger > > -- > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/hugin-ptx/878t8j4b12.fsf%40wilson.bronger.org. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CAK65kiGYsodg_5SFHcRUdavsCJ6PNyT2gTJi2sHsd9Ptj4QDeg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
