RE: TRACING THE HUM/Article Epoch Times(John Dawes)

[Geoff Wood]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hum-sufferers@googlegroups.com [mailto:hum-
> suffer...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Trev

It is irresponsible of those articles to called the wave a "hum". Hums are
audible by definition, indicating low frequencies, say below 100Hz, down to
the lowest audible frequencies  , which are over 20Hz.  The "hum" they are
describing is 10milliHertz   That is 0.01 Hz.  You would not sense this with
a sound meter - more a seismographic or barometer !

Their headlineand shallow synopsis just adds to the confusion re real hums,
and The Hum. Totally unrelated.

geoff


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum 
Sufferers" group.
To post to this group, send email to hum-sufferers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hum-sufferers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---