Hi dboots; Just type in Characteristics, Dosimetry & Measurement of EMF it's out there google and yahoo. or www.WHO.int/peh-emf/meetings/southkorea/en/SeoulWHOTaki.pdf. What I like to read is thier Workgroup Reports. Workgroup Report: Base Stations and Wireless Networks-Radiofrequency (RF) Exposures and Health Consequences, is the latest I've found. http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2006/9633/9633.html I find the workgroup reports give an insight; In the one mentioned above they rant about lay people and how that we just don't understand how complicated this subject is. I would like to rant a bit too, difficult, they should be in the position of trying to prove that the hum does have a detrimental physical effect. I wrote and asked them to be honest about the hearing effect. It p's me off when I read that they say it is a trival effect, let them see the pain created by my facial nerve, which I can not control. I hope the information provided can link you Patty
On Feb 19, 7:10 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > John Fudge Factor is right The webs they weave when they practice > to deceive > Patty Can you supply the link to this pdf ur referencing??? From > what I have learned about WHO, their funding leans their studies to be > also part of the problem of the "Fudge Factor" of influencing public > opinion > so sometimes we need to take time and try to read between the lines > for the truth because WHO > is never going to give you the whole truth and nothing but the truth > NEVER > > but nevertheless could you give us the link to this pdf anyway just > so we > can check out any newest fudge factors within some of their > representations? > > Thanks > > D > > On Feb 10, 4:41 am, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi John; Check out in Google Scholar: Characteristics, Dosimetry & > > Measurement of EMF by M. Taki a WHO Taki pdf from the Seoul South > > Korea Meeting - Some representations of the microwave auditory effect. > > It's near the end of the pdf.. > > Just Sharing > > Patty > > > On Feb 8, 4:23 pm, pmm232 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I have been pushing different Political Members here in Australia > > > Labor and Liberal Governments also Local Council in the Town of > > > Maitland,New South Wales and the response with the Local Federal Labor > > > Member was it is unfortunate that I am very sensitive to this and even > > > if I moved I could suffer the same. > > > > Very helpful particularly when I think the problem here comes from the > > > Industrial area close to where I live no-one will get measurements > > > taken at my home only Lance Batey so far. > > > What do you have to do , run around the streets with a placard to get > > > help. > > > > I am sure this is coming from the Industrial Area, proving it is the > > > problem. > > > Best Wishes, > > > Pam M. > > > > On Feb 1, 11:32 pm, "John Dawes" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The British Government has been aware of the Hum problem for the past > > > > 40 years and has made a few feeble attempts to find the cause. > > > > For the past 32 years the Department of the Environment (DoE) now part > > > > of the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) has > > > > been researching the problem and has achieved nothing, they are now no > > > > closer to finding the cause than the day they began. > > > > The latest wheeze from this department is to employ a psychiatrist and > > > > a psychologist who will convince Hum sufferers that the problem is all > > > > in the mind and if sufferers stop thinking about the Hum it will go > > > > away. > > > > This is a typical British solution which places the onus on those > > > > affected and covers up the tarnished image of the so-called experts. > > > > British Government funding also goes to the University of Salford who > > > > has been investigating the problem for the past 22 years and like the > > > > DoE has achieved absolutely nothing, although they appear not to be > > > > seeking a medical or psychological solution but rely more on a > > > > scientific fudge factor. > > > > Examination of the web pages of these two departments will show that in > > > > a combined total of 74 years of public research they have not managed > > > > to make one single measurement of the Hum. > > > > Unable to find any answer, these departments have repeated made the > > > > ludicrous claim that Hum sufferers have super sensitive hearing. > > > > It has been known for many years, and now substantiated by those who > > > > completed the survey on this web site, that the majority of sufferers > > > > are over the age of 50, many have poor hearing, and some are totally > > > > deaf. > > > > An old deaf person with fantastic hearing powers must be something new > > > > for the medical records, and only a government scientist could come up > > > > with an explanation like this. > > > > However, it is fair to say that these are not the only government > > > > departments who live in the realms of fantasy, after exhaustive > > > > research, the head of an NHS hospital department specialising in > > > > auditory problems has also recently made a similar statement. > > > > > The latest British Government Minister to turn a deaf ear to the plight > > > > of Hum sufferers is Ms Gillian Merrion MP. Minister of State at the > > > > Department of Health. We can only hope that the forthcoming General > > > > Election will bring a change in Government and Ms Merrion can employ > > > > her undoubted talents elseware.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
