Trev You are still trotting out "Tinnitus" as valid of that it can't be denied??? Why because someone tagged it with a label and that makes it supposely valid??? Wouldn't you have an expectation considering the vast ear models they have nowadays, that they would have an inkling by now of what might be the cause of the so called ringing in the ears?????
You allude that "much research is Gov't or Corp funded" as you apply it to the Hum, but you don't give the same consideration to the label of "tinnitus"??? I do agree with you, yes we are in a sad state I highly doubt it is going to get any better, least wise as long as they have labels they can get away with because by the time more of the population gets wise they don't have to walk around with doctors going I DON'T KNOW. The more people walking around going I DON"T KNOW, most likely THE MORE QUESTIONS GET ASKED BY THE NOT SO SELF SERVING OF AN ESTABLISHMENT. Watchdogs? Where? just kidding :) On Jul 9, 11:26 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > Well Dee- I think that the mechanisms are quite complex- looking at > what the ear/brain is capable of. My original comment ,though, was > aimed at the complexity of the Hum issus in terms of its presentation > and reportage at large. > On here and elsewhere there's a wealth of experiences and opinions, > all valid in their way more or less even the tinnitus issue can't be > totally denied, however irritating it can be as a 'get out'. > I've no doubt that much research is repressed and though the taxpayer > funds a lot of it, directly or indirectly not enough pressure is > applied as to what's found out & really going on, in many fields. > Watchdogs and the press are too hand in glove with power brokers- look > at the Murdoch saga unfolding now... and quangos are mostly self > serving- like the rest of the establishment. > A sad state to be in , really! > > On Jul 10, 5:51 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Not that complex What it shows is how much knowledge they are > > gaining of understanding the signalling process's of the sense > > modality of auditory perceptions. What it shows is they are learning > > how to explain to a computer more and more of the auditory signalling > > process's of what the auditory sense experiences of getting from point > > A to point B and branching out to other points of pathways that get > > utilized. > > It is not that complex to grasp that in depth research has been > > going on for quite some time and we only know what they want us to > > know concerning articles they release vs information they prefer to > > keep under wraps. > > But that's just my opinion.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
