Sorry Trev but it is just hard for my mind to fathom, that you would bring up the subject of "Tinninitus" considering the subject thread of "Aspects of Auditory Fooling by the Brain" Ringing frequency's could just be another form of auditory fooling is what comes to my mind It is a form of Binary afterall. And our brains do think in Binary. But that's just my opinion.
On Jul 14, 10:00 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > Dee- I hope we can put this tinnitus thing to bed. I don't think it's > the cause of hum,as we discuss it here, but itself is only getting > more attention, as of late, and at the higher freq end of things - > where I DO also get it. > A tinnitus sufferer my have both IT- and Hum, either or neither, > Untill the whole shebang is sorted out properly- which is unlikely any > time soon, all possibilities have to be kept open for clarity of > outcome. > I know that watchdogs are pretty useless or non existent, but banging > a drum in the dark serves nobody well. > Yes, questions need to be asked but the issue is below the horizon duw > to low reportage and sufferers feeling isolated and ignored. > This is what we're trying to deal for here- and can't replace properly > funded research. It is a slow process & here John would agree. > > On Jul 14, 8:57 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Trev You are still trotting out "Tinnitus" as valid of that it > > can't be denied??? > > Why because someone tagged it with a label and that makes it > > supposely valid??? > > Wouldn't you have an expectation considering the vast ear models they > > have nowadays, > > that they would have an inkling by now of what might be the cause of > > the so called > > ringing in the ears????? > > > You allude that "much research is Gov't or Corp funded" as you apply > > it to the Hum, but you don't give the same consideration to the label > > of "tinnitus"??? > > > I do agree with you, yes we are in a sad state I highly doubt it > > is going to get any better, least wise as long as they have labels > > they can get away with because by the time more of the population gets > > wise they don't have to walk around with doctors > > going I DON'T KNOW. The more people walking around going I DON"T > > KNOW, most > > likely THE MORE QUESTIONS GET ASKED BY THE NOT SO SELF SERVING > > OF AN ESTABLISHMENT. > > > Watchdogs? Where? just kidding :) > > > On Jul 9, 11:26 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Well Dee- I think that the mechanisms are quite complex- looking at > > > what the ear/brain is capable of. My original comment ,though, was > > > aimed at the complexity of the Hum issus in terms of its presentation > > > and reportage at large. > > > On here and elsewhere there's a wealth of experiences and opinions, > > > all valid in their way more or less even the tinnitus issue can't be > > > totally denied, however irritating it can be as a 'get out'. > > > I've no doubt that much research is repressed and though the taxpayer > > > funds a lot of it, directly or indirectly not enough pressure is > > > applied as to what's found out & really going on, in many fields. > > > Watchdogs and the press are too hand in glove with power brokers- look > > > at the Murdoch saga unfolding now... and quangos are mostly self > > > serving- like the rest of the establishment. > > > A sad state to be in , really! > > > > On Jul 10, 5:51 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Not that complex What it shows is how much knowledge they are > > > > gaining of understanding the signalling process's of the sense > > > > modality of auditory perceptions. What it shows is they are learning > > > > how to explain to a computer more and more of the auditory signalling > > > > process's of what the auditory sense experiences of getting from point > > > > A to point B and branching out to other points of pathways that get > > > > utilized. > > > > It is not that complex to grasp that in depth research has been > > > > going on for quite some time and we only know what they want us to > > > > know concerning articles they release vs information they prefer to > > > > keep under wraps. > > > > But that's just my opinion.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
