Exactly my point Trev and as stated many times before here, “If you
don’t complain to the right people, you don’t have a problem.”

Which is to say Will; if you simply sit around and beat up the people
who are trying to do something then you are having a negative impact –
Nobody takes you seriously, therefore your problem does not get
recognition.

To beat this “thing” a start line has to be drawn. Once on the map as
a major problem other areas get addressed as the process continues.

To simply do nothing is defeatism.


On Feb 9, 11:56 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anything that increases self determinism is good on the Hum issue.
> One of the most subtle factors on the intrusion is the helpless,
> sheeplike futility of fighting such a huge imposition in all our
> lives.
> I always keep an open mind on what is behind hum- but i fail to see
> why Will is so defeatist even before the event.
> Even if a class action is the only establishment recognized way of
> doing business, people will need to be pulled together across borders
> to enable this to find a solution for all,eventually.
> There may be different hums and it will be difficult to prove
> culpability across borders- but once the ball starts to roll it will
> become easier , not harder, by what Vic is trying to do.
>
> On Feb 10, 1:56 am, Vic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > First you tell me to f off, now you tell me to shut up. Nice kinda guy
> > ain't you Will?
>
> > Yep, I make grammatical errors. You tend to when you communicate with
> > others. Typos and spelling mistakes too.
>
> > So, what have YOU done since you were last here Vili - Started legal
> > action on anything? Anything at all? Probably not.
>
> > For a Class Action to occur, first the complainants have to have a
> > common complaint - Hardly likely given the circumstances and
> > personalities here.
>
> > On Feb 9, 8:28 pm, Will Godson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Nobody actually knows what is causing it (shut up Vic), and you have
> > > made a grammatical error.
>
> > > Something more general would be much better. I, myself, would be happy
> > > just to have the issue recognised and investigated properly. In order
> > > for it to be 'considered for debate' 100,000 signatures will be
> > > required, that's 1 in 600. Although I know many people who hear it, I
> > > can't imagine if I spoke to 600 about it I would find another as badly
> > > affected as myself. A nice idea but...
>
> > > This is another military/industrial cover-up which is affecting the
> > > lives of a fraction of a percent of people. The government are already
> > > involved in the stitch-up job. Even if we were to reach critical mass
> > > do you really think it would receive a fair hearing?
>
> > > I believe the best way to tackle this would be a class-action law suit.- 
> > > Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum 
Sufferers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.

Reply via email to