Dear folks, I do not know what others think about the discussion but for me I would be grateful if we could stop it. Me personally I can't stand it any longer. So please, have mercy.
Best regards, Ulrich Von: Kazimierz Verkmastare <[email protected]> Antworten an: <[email protected]> Datum: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:25:51 -0500 An: <[email protected]> Betreff: Re: [HG-new] Re: Affordable Hurdy Gurdy Construction Alden, I hope you don't mind me using you for an example. Steve, will you agree with this statement - "If what you want is an Olympic Chinook, then you shouldn't expect, unless you are Cali and Alden, to be able to build one for less than they do. They have streamlined production and amortized costs, and probably can't lower costs (materials + labor + tools) further." Now if you think you can create significant savings, you have to start with a belief that the margin in HG building even for a big name is large, and I can tell you it is not. Sure, you will save the cost of keeping a storefront open, the electricity, the advertising, and such. But if you are working in your own home, you are paying for the space you are occupying anyway. Electricity, rent or mortgage, insurance, taxes. But the margin for a gurdy is not 50%, probably not 25% or 30%. So say you want a Chinook, if you are as skilled and knowledgable as the Hackmans, you can build yourself one for probably $1700 or $1800, real cost. (Don't remove labor cost from the equation - your time is worth it). If you aren't as skilled, you will spend twice or more in labor, and likely more in parts than they do (because they source materials as a business and have had years to find the most cost-effective suppliers). Likely the cost of all materials that go into a chinook will be about $900 (this is prepared parts, not raw materials. You can skew your numbers by taking everything back to the most basic state - brass and steel and delrin chunks not turned into bearings and supports and shafts, and the like, but that is again foolish, I will find a way to get the basic materials cost of a Weishcelbaumer down to $100 in raw, raw materials, but then you need the tools and the time to turn the materials into usable gurdy parts, and you don't do that with a handful of garage tools and beginner level skill). When a person goes into production, they source materials and resources at costs most of us can't match. So we will pay more for our toy in materials than they will. And because they are experienced, they have the minimum labor time possible - you will not match that first time out. And unless your time is worth nothing, you have to include what your time is worth in what you will spend. So go out and spend the thousands of hours getting the experience. And make sure not to charge those hours to the account. So when Augusto remarked that you have to be doing it for the fun of it, that is the only way to remove labor costs. If you are building just to save money, you can, but time is more valuable. And no, it doesn't have to be exotic woods. But if what you want is what you have heard, the Weischelbaumer or the old Pajot or the Eaton, then you get that by using the materials they used the way they used them. But lets start cutting money corners and using locally sourced wood. Do you know enough about how to choose some spruce boards from the lumberyard to resaw a soundboard out of? Or will you just use whatever and accept the results. If you know enough to really do a fine job digging a good soundboard out of a hunk of wood, then you are already out of thos conversation - you have skills already that set you up for success. Tools? You don't need tools. A pocketknife, a piece of broken window glass, a hacksaw blade nailed to a bent willow twig, a carpenter's pencil and a leather punch, that's all you need, right? No. You need tools to give you precision cuts, precision circles, precision press fits. And you don't have to buy new and expensive, you can haunt the garage and estate sales, Craigslist, Ebay and the like, and outfit your shop with a reasonable collection of tools for a moderate sum. But here again you are trading time in setting up and repairing and refreshing these tools for money, and often, unless you are a professional tool refab technician, you end up spending total more than a new tool would cost, or using a tool that gives marginal results (and a gurdy isn't happy with marginal anything). So I am saying that if you start from scratch, there is no way that the total cost will be less than that of the professional. If you don't count the time and ancillary cost you can fool yourself into thinking that you have found a really good deal. But the cost is inversely proportional to your skill and setup status. Those who have to come here and tell us they are new to building, they are depressed at the cost of professional instruments and they want to build a good one for themselves cheap - "How do I do that?" - are not often going to succeed with those parameters. They might succeed in getting a cheap instrument that barely plays first time out, or a good instrument that ended up costing them far beyond their expectations first time out, or they might get hooked and make a great instrument their 4th or 5th project. But a player who wants a good instrument but can't afford one and has little woodworking skills does not stand a great chance of success in building a great gurdy fast and with only a couple of hundred bucks to throw at the project. And those are the folks we address here. If you are a more advanced craftsman than that, you didn't come here asking us how to do it, you just started and did it, and often showed off your results afterwards to us. Kinda like, a, er, builder? And if you are a builder, you will succeed. But you didn't ask, now, did you? Because you didn't need to - you already knew how to succeed. Chris > So this discussion seems to have boiled down to two camps, those > who say it's possible to make a good instrument for a low cost by > spending enough time on the project, and those who say it's > impossible to make any instrument without spending more money than > buying a professionally made one. > > So those of you who say it'll cost you more to build one than buy > one, where are your numbers? What exactly is it that is going to > cost more money? I'm seriously interested in specifically what you > are thinking the money will go towards. Do you truly believe you > can't build a good sounding instrument without spending thousands > of dollars on exotic hard woods (and therefore a beginner will ruin > more expensive wood than a new instrument will cost.) Or do you > believe that only a $600 block plane will make the proper top for a > good sounding instrument? > > > Lets have some specifics, not just a generalized "it'll cost more" > statement. > > > -Steve > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Kazimierz Verkmastare > <[email protected]> wrote> > > [snip]. . . >> >> >> It is a project done for enjoyment, and because I am wasting >> resources as I am building knowledge, it is NOT going to be >> significantly more economical than if I had commissioned it. ... >> that it will end up expensive (the cost is truly inversely >> proportional to your skill and resources), -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hurdygurdy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy The rules of posting, courtesy, and other list information may be found at http://hurdygurdy.com/mailinglist/index.htm. To reduce spam, posts from new subscribers are held pending approval by the webmaster. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hurdygurdy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy The rules of posting, courtesy, and other list information may be found at http://hurdygurdy.com/mailinglist/index.htm. To reduce spam, posts from new subscribers are held pending approval by the webmaster.
