I agree, metric (I will convert to US as necessary to use my tools) should be the standard.
Now I need to go out and get a couple decent metric straightedges (and metric pencil lead - 0.7mm for my new drafting pencil). <grin>
And the logic seems reasonable.
So unless there is an objection, I will list 178 mm for the wheel diameter.
Chris
> I would suggest making all measurements in metric, and setting the
> default wheel size at 178 mm, for the reasons listed below:
>
> Alden's size (7" = 177.8 mm) is normal for western instruments,
> which generally have wheels larger than 160 mm (=6.3"). 170 mm
> (=6.7") is a pretty typical minimum diameter in Europe, and, as you
> can see, Alden and Cali are pretty darn close to that number.
> (Smaller than 170 mm for Western repertoire as a smaller wheel
> imposes different rhythmic limitations on the dog. It cuts both
> ways: playing Hungarian music on a large wheel is hard.)
>
> So unless you want to build a Central-/Eastern-European instrument
> or a historic instrument, 178 mm is about a perfect size.
>
> Some makers will go larger than that for more complex instruments,
> but since the goal is to create a reference instrument, there would
> be no reason to have 12 strings or something like that and the
> 7"/178 mm wheel is good choice, especially if you want to talk
> about measurements for other parts where OMI instruments might be
> used as exemplars.
>
> Best,
>
> -Arle
>
> On Nov 5, 2011, at 23:01 , Alden and Cali wrote:
>
>> Our "standard" HG wheel is 7" diameter.
>>
>> Alden
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hurdygurdy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy The rules of posting, courtesy, and other list information may be found at http://hurdygurdy.com/mailinglist/index.htm. To reduce spam, posts from new subscribers are held pending approval by the webmaster. |
Re: [HG-new] Specifications for proposed 'builder gurdy' - part 2, consensus on a second measurement
- Re: [HG-new] Specifications for proposed 'builde... Barbara Currier
- Re: [HG-new] Specifications for proposed 'builde... Felicia Dale
- Re: [HG-new] Specifications for proposed 'builde... JULIE BARKER
- Re: [HG-new] Specifications for proposed 'builde... Felicia Dale
- Re: [HG-new] Specifications for proposed 'builde... cwhill
- [HG-new] Specifications for proposed 'builder gu... Kazimierz Verkmastare
- [HG-new] Re: Specifications for proposed 'builde... Alden and Cali
- [HG-new] ***Builder HG*** Current 'Builder HG' s... Kazimierz Verkmastare
- Re: [HG-new] Specifications for proposed 'builde... Arle Lommel
- [HG-new] Re: Specifications for proposed 'builde... Alden and Cali
- Re: [HG-new] Specifications for proposed 'builde... Kazimierz Verkmastare
- Re: [HG-new] Specifications for proposed etc...I... JULIE BARKER
- Re: [HG-new] Specifications for proposed etc...I... Augusto de Ornellas Abreu
- Re: [HG-new] Specifications for proposed etc...I... Matthew Szostak
- OT talking about maildiscipline, was Re: [HG-new... Simon Wascher
- Re: OT talking about maildiscipline, was Re: [HG... Judith Lindenau
- Re: OT talking about maildiscipline, was Re: [HG... Augusto de Ornellas Abreu
- Re: [HG-new] Specifications for proposed etc...I... Roy Trotter
- RE: [HG-new] Specifications for proposed 'builde... Norm Sohl
- Re: [HG-new] Specifications for proposed 'builde... Simon Wascher
- Re: [HG-new] Specifications for proposed 'builde... Steven Tucker
