To all reacting to my mail on the Aachen (medieval hurdy gurdy),

Thank you very much for the very interesting reactions. At this moment
I am on holiday and have just a moment for reading the email.
Afterwards I will answer.
Moreover, I will be at the festival of Chateau d'Ars on saturday and
sunday with the Aachen (leaving it at the stand of Chris Allen and
Sabina).

With kind regarfds

Ernic

2012/6/28, michael <[email protected]>:
>
>
>   _____
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 28 June 2012 08:24
> To: Digest Recipients
> Subject: [HG-new] Digest for [email protected] - 2 Messages in 2
> Topics
>
>    Today's Topic Summary
> Group:  <http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/topics>
> http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/topics
> *                                Digest for [email protected] - 8
> Messages in 2 Topics [1 Update]
> *                                strings [1 Update]
>   <http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/t/f672087fe08de95e> Digest for
> [email protected] - 8 Messages in 2 Topics
> "michael" <[email protected]> Jun 27 09:05PM +0100
>
> _____
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 27 June 2012 08:54
> To: Digest Recipients
> Subject: [HG-new] Digest for [email protected] - 8 Messages in 2
> Topics
>
> Today's Topic Summary
> Group: <http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/topics>
> http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/topics
> * a medieval hurdy gurdy - Youtube clips [4
> Updates]
> * Breathalizers and hurdy-gurdies [4 Updates]
> <http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/t/69bbfa5ecb47005e> a medieval
> hurdy gurdy - Youtube clips
> Ernic Kamerich <[email protected]> Jun 26 08:09AM +0200
>
> For playing medieval music on hurdy gurdy, solo and in consorts, I have
> been using a box hurdy gurdy. It has a nice sound that mixes very well with
> singers, medieval fiddles, recorders, etc. It does so much better than most
> modern hurdy gurdies, (modern hurdy-gurdies are larger instruments of the
> early 18th cent  form and can be set up to play quietly and sweetly.. In
> period
> performance, however, it is more appealing to have a model of the period)
> but it is rather modest in character and loudness.
> Moreover, box hurdy gurdies seem to have been rare in the middle ages: most
> paintings and sculptures with a hurdy gurdy show an instrument that looks
> rather much like a fiddle with a wheel. Which no doubt it is – vielle a roue
> = wheel fiddle.
>
> With my combined interest in medieval (and renaissance) music, which I play
> in consorts (the term consort is normally reserved for a group of
> instruments of the same type
> but at different pitches, such as consort of viols or recorders.) already
> nearly 40 years, and in bourdon music, especially of the hurdy gurdy, I
> wished to get a medieval hurdy gurdy. However, apart from the organistrum,
> which surely is not a melody+drone instrument but meant to supply a variable
> drone in parallel organum to a melody, and the box hurdy gurdy, often called
> with the general medieval name for hurdy-
> gurdy, "symphonie", none of the renowned makers of hurdy gurdies offered
> such an instrument. Symphony means sounding together. De oldest type I have
> seen is of about 1500 after the
> "Garden of earthly delights" of Jeroen Bosch or comparable. The organistrum
> may be tuned in various ways, just like our modern instrument. It may be
> used to play a drone only, organum melody,  or drone only, as in our
> successful recording ‘a Feather on the Breath of God’ or a monody which can
> be lively, with one or more drones,.
> The Santiago type is large and sounds an octave lower than normal. (I sell
> plans for
> this.) The players are often depicted as singing and it seems likely that
> the
> instrument was used for teaching the new tunes which were sent around
> Europe
> by the Vatican. As Europe developed culturally the organistrum was replaced
> by the organ (And see pp 4-6 of The Hurdy-gurdy Method). Odo’s drawing is
> suspect, seeming to be a copy of a copy. The details are never right in
> these drawings, being copied and re-copied from chap books by scribes who
> did not know the instrument at first hand.
>
> I could persuade Chris Allen and Sabina Kormylo (http://www.hurdygurdy.org)
> to make a medieval hurdy gurdy for me. First we discussed more than a year
> on model and many details, then they started and last summer it got ready.
> It was a thrilling moment when I got the instrument in my hands: I knew
> rather well what I wanted to hear, what character I had hoped for. It was a
> revelation: it was even better. It is really a wonderful instrument for
> medieval music, a joy to play. I have a ‘square’ sinfonye which is 4o years
> old. The earliest repros were too small owing to a misinterpretation of the
> iconography.
>
> Now I have been making some recordings and uploaded them on Youtube, one
> well known piece, La Manfredina, and some clips demonstrating and
> explaining the instrument (some not ready at this moment). I hope that
> these clips are worth while both for who has a general interest as for who
> knows already more about the subject. Yes, very interesting. Michael
> Muskett
>
> - La Manfredina
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nR_R3FhkQ4E
>
> - A medieval hurdy gurdy 1: introduction
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0J41t_XV5g
>
> - A medieval hurdy gurdy 2: early history - the drone
>
> (not ready at this moment)
>
> - A medieval hurdy gurdy 3: sound and model
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9j1KmZuU-dw
>
> - A medieval hurdy gurdy 4: playing modal music - strings
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ciEmQOZlAs
>
> - A medieval hurdy gurdy 5: repertoire - range and available accidentals
>
> (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hAvGYyrKCY)
>
> - A medieval hurdy gurdy 6: a buzz string on a medieval hurdy gurdy?
>
> (not ready at this moment)
>
> - A medieval hurdy gurdy 7: temperament
>
> (not ready at this moment)
>
> I would like to draw your attention you for this.
>
> With kind regards
>
> Ernic Kamerich (Doede de Draaier)
>
> Wolodymyr Smishkewych <[email protected]> Jun 26 12:14PM
> +0100
>
> Dear Ernic,
>
> Many thanks for your message and for the YouTube links. It is wonderful to
> hear about the Aachen and your role in developing it with Chris and Sabina;
> I have been considering getting their sinfonie and it is very good to know
> that perhaps this might be an option as well.
>
> Many thoughts have always been on my mind regarding the issue of the HG in
> the medieval, and what we now do in our "early music ensembles." The
> instrument which I play with ensemble Sequentia is one developed in
> conjunction with my brother Eugene Smishkewych, and it is based on the body
> of instruments found on the porticoes of the cathedrals in Leon, Burgos,
> and
> Burgo de Osma (you can google "smishkewych & smishkewych organistrum" and
> see images of it). It, too, is an amalgam of various hypothesis and
> desires,
> and even such an instrument which could be described as "limited" in range
> or use fulfills the needs we ask of it in the ensemble. This comes, of
> course, of limiting its use to its capabilities, but I also included some
> individual, anachronistic additions, such as a release-capo to provide the
> subfinalis on the melody string, and it has many more keys than on the
> models in stone. It is in that sense based on the order of gamut-tangents
> such as in Odo of Cluny's drawing, so it includes B and Bb (or in the case
> f
> concrete pitches, F and F#) at the top of the octave, which makes my
> instrument in effect have the range F-G-a-b-c-d-e-f-f#-g.
>
> I have often considered that what we ask of these reproductions and
> reconstructions of medieval instruments is o informed by our present-day
> needs and wants that they depart from being reconstructions--which can be
> OK
> so long as we acknowledge it. We are even in our music--perhaps especially
> so in our music-making!--representing really only what our 21st century,
> present-day imaginations can make of artifacts and a collective memory of
> something approaching a "Repertoire." I use that word with caution, because
> of course the HG has both everything and nothing as a repertoire when it
> comes to the medieval. It can be sued on so much, and to it belongs so
> little (pretty much nothing). 'La Manfredina' fits beautifully on the
> "Aachen", and now so does 'Ghaëtta', thanks to the chromatic key-option you
> requested of the makers. But would 'Ghaëtta' ever have been played by a HG
> player, a 'sinfoniator'? Not likely, but perhaps s/he dreamt of the option,
> whereas a fidula or tibia (bagpipe) or fistula (flute) player would have
> been able to and not so restricted by the instrument, since chromatic
> alterations were easier to achieve. The instrument was possibly both unable
> to respond to trends and faithful to its original conceptions by its nature
> (that of a vocal accompaniment instrument). And of course there is the
> important consideration that we now respond very much more to the
> dance-element of medieval music and our modern culture has much less
> patience for the poetic, slower, (and often sung) repertoire. We are
> forever
> making rationales (I have been guilty of this myself!) for cutting numbers
> of verses (e.g. "public will not listen or have patience,"
> "presenter/radio/CD needs X amount of minutes," etc) and the audience
> always
> seems to want sets or concerts to end with "Drums and fun." These are of
> course all modern considerations and since they often involve our
> livelihoods we definitely respond to them, but they are still of our times
> as far as we can tell. It is not to say they were not ideas present in the
> medieval but we cannot see that far back with any clarity and can only make
> our best educated assumptions.
>
> Nonetheless, it is wonderful that you are adding to the possibilities
> available for medieval HGs. I myself have considered the sinfonie as I
> mentioned above, as well as one that was reconstructed by Antonio Poves
> (http://www.organistrum.com/ap.htm), based on a triptych from the
> monasteria
> de Piedra in Zaragoza. These instruments have similar constructions and
> they
> appear to head from the concept of making "organum sine magister" to a more
> melodic use of the instrument.
>
> But even so, the concept of a medieval HG as solely an instrumental
> enterprise is an intriguing and difficult one. We could quote the
> miniatures
> from the Cantigas to say "there is an example of sinfonias playing alone"
> but there is always the problem that the Cantigas miniatures were likely
> meant more as an encyclopedia cataloguing the many things going on at
> Alfonso's court, a veritable propaganda book for his kingdom as much as a
> valuable codex of songs (but even that was a state-sponsored sort of
> ethnomusicological enterprise). So truly, while this is all of great
> interest and use to us today, we must take so much of it with the
> proverbial
> "grain of salt."
>
> I am interested in knowing more of the balance of the "Aachen:" how well
> does it work as an instrument accompanying singing? Is it too loud for
> accompanying solo singing, but could it work for ensemble singing, such as
> we do in the Sequentia men's ensemble (5-6 voices)?
>
> In the end what we ask of our HG choice is to do what we want it to do
> best.
> I don't play certain types of music, so I don't need certain features on my
> instrument, and adding them on would take away from something else I value,
> which is the ability to have an instrument that responds to my approach to
> studying history and performing music that has a certain historical
> context.
> I respect that many other musicians have the need and desire to play
> multiple repertoires and in various concert contexts and therefore I think
> it is great that all of these options are open, and even better that we
> continue to push the envelope in all directions.
>
> Thank you though, Ernic, for adding to the "medieval corner" which often
> gets a bit hidden or obscured by other influences in our HG world! I look
> forward to being in touch!
>
> All best,
> Vlad
>
>
> On 26 Jun 2012, at 07:09, Ernic Kamerich wrote:
>
>
> Wolodymyr Smishkewych <[email protected]> Jun 26 12:15PM
> +0100
>
> OOps! Sorry all, I intended that to be a private response to Ernic. Somehow
> the HG group name isn't visible propeorly in my "to" field...Oh well, now
> you all have my homily for your entertainment.
>
> Have a great week!
> Vlad
>
> On 26 Jun 2012, at 12:14, Wolodymyr Smishkewych wrote:
>
>
> Margarita Rankin <[email protected]> Jun 26 06:33PM -0500
>
> As a sinfonia player myself, I enjoyed that. Nothing to be sorry about!
>
> --Margarita
> On Jun 26, 2012 6:15 AM, "Wolodymyr Smishkewych" <
>
> <http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/t/2885d9c0b98c83f0>
> Breathalizers and hurdy-gurdies
> JULIE BARKER <[email protected]> Jun 26 05:32PM +0100
>
> This might at first seem a long way off topic but in view of the fact that
> some of us hope to go to France for the gurdy festival season it might just
> be relevent.
> I have heard that from 1st July it is to become law for every car to carry
> a
> breathalizer. Does anyone out there know about this? I remember a few years
> ago they introduced the hi-viz jacket rule at what seemed like short
> notice.
>
> Philip G Martin aka Drohne
> www.drohne.co.uk
>
> cwhill <[email protected]> Jun 26 06:16PM +0100
>
> Yes, that's quite correct. From 1st July you must carry a portable one
> if you are driving in France. It's NOT a joke. The fine for not having
> one is 11Euro!
> You can buy them at the channel ports. The good news is that they are
> only a couple of pounds (limit in France is 50mg per 100ml of blood (30
> lower than the UK).
> You also need more than one (if you use it, you won't be legal unless
> you still have an unused one in the car).
> You are not required to actually use it, of course, just to have one in
> the car!
>
> http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1073607_france-decrees-mandatory-breathal
> yzers-in-all-cars-by-july-1
>
> Colin Hill
>
>
> On 26/06/2012 17:32, JULIE BARKER wrote:
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2180 / Virus Database: 2437/5094 - Release Date: 06/26/12
>
> cwhill <[email protected]> Jun 26 06:18PM +0100
>
> Yes, that's quite correct. From 1st July you must carry a portable one
> if you are driving in France. It's NOT a joke. The fine for not having
> one is 11Euro!
> You can buy them at the channel ports. The good news is that they are
> only a couple of pounds (limit in France is 50mg per 100ml of blood (30
> lower than the UK).
> You also need more than one (if you use it, you won't be legal unless
> you still have an unused one in the car).
> You are not required to actually use it, of course, just to have one in
> the car!
>
> http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1073607_france-decrees-mandatory-breathal
> yzers-in-all-cars-by-july-1
>
> Colin Hill
>
>
> On 26/06/2012 17:32, JULIE BARKER wrote:
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2180 / Virus Database: 2437/5094 - Release Date: 06/26/12
>
> cwhill <[email protected]> Jun 26 06:24PM +0100
>
> Apologies for the multiple replies. Didn't notice the same message was
> posted to several groups as CC and I just hit reply on the ones I'm a
> member of so they all came through here (first named group)! Sorry.
>
> Colin Hill
>
>
> On 26/06/2012 17:32, JULIE BARKER wrote:
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2180 / Virus Database: 2437/5094 - Release Date: 06/26/12
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
> hurdygurdy.
> You can <mailto:[email protected]> post via email.
> To unsubscribe from this group,
> <mailto:[email protected]> send an empty message.
> For more options, <http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/topics> visit
> this group.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "hurdygurdy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy
>
> The rules of posting, courtesy, and other list information may be found at
> http://hurdygurdy.com/mailinglist/index.htm. To reduce spam, posts from new
> subscribers are held pending approval by the webmaster.
>
>   <http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/t/9edb89343c775c72> strings
> Paul Sherwood <[email protected]> Jun 27 05:10PM +0100
>
> Sorry for the slow reply, I have only used nylgut for the high d chanter.
> They are sold with an 'equivalent gut' specification, see
>
> http://www.aquilacorde.com/index.php?option=com_content
> <http://www.aquilacorde.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=66%3Athick-nylgut-strings&catid=11%3Athick-nylgut-strings&Itemid=240<=en>
> &view=article&id=66%3Athick-nylgut-strings&catid=11%3Athick-nylgut-strings&Itemid=240〈=en
>
> Paul
>
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
> hurdygurdy.
> You can  <mailto:[email protected]> post via email.
> To unsubscribe from this group,
> <mailto:[email protected]> send an empty message.
> For more options,  <http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/topics> visit
> this group.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "hurdygurdy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy
>
> The rules of posting, courtesy, and other list information may be found at
> http://hurdygurdy.com/mailinglist/index.htm. To reduce spam, posts from new
> subscribers are held pending approval by the webmaster.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "hurdygurdy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy
>
> The rules of posting, courtesy, and other list information may be found at
> http://hurdygurdy.com/mailinglist/index.htm.  To reduce spam, posts from new
> subscribers are held pending approval by the webmaster.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "hurdygurdy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy

The rules of posting, courtesy, and other list information may be found at 
http://hurdygurdy.com/mailinglist/index.htm.  To reduce spam, posts from new 
subscribers are held pending approval by the webmaster.

Reply via email to