On Sep 22, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > hwloc_set_*? hwloc_objset* ? Anything better? > > hwloc_set_* might not be the best since we would have a hwloc_set_set() > function to set one bit :)
Agreed. Too bad, though -- I liked hwloc_set*. hwloc_group* (that seems kinda lame, though) hwloc_stuff* (hah) hwloc_bitmap* ? > By the way, hwloc_cpuset_cpu() and hwloc_cpuset_all_but_cpu() should be > renamed too. hwloc_set_onlyone() and hwloc_set_allbutone() maybe? How about just hwloc_set() which takes a single position parameter? "onlyone" can be implied. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
