Le 22/09/2010 16:30, Jeff Squyres a écrit : > On Sep 22, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > > >> hwloc_set_*? hwloc_objset* ? Anything better? >> >> hwloc_set_* might not be the best since we would have a hwloc_set_set() >> function to set one bit :) >> > Agreed. Too bad, though -- I liked hwloc_set*. > > hwloc_group* (that seems kinda lame, though) > hwloc_stuff* (hah) > hwloc_bitmap* > > ? >
bitmap or bitmask would be acceptable to me. >> By the way, hwloc_cpuset_cpu() and hwloc_cpuset_all_but_cpu() should be >> renamed too. hwloc_set_onlyone() and hwloc_set_allbutone() maybe? >> > How about just hwloc_set() which takes a single position parameter? > "onlyone" can be implied. > In case you missed it: cpu() = zero() + set() and all_but_cpu() = fill() + clr() Maybe just drop these? Brice
