Am Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:34:46 -0500 (CDT) schrieb "Gabriel M. Beddingfield" <[email protected]>:
> > Watching the conversations over the future of Hydrogen, there appears to > be two distinct types of visions: > > 1. Those that keep Hydrogen focused on drums. Creating, > performing, and editing drum patterns. Some even > use Hydrogen strictly as a drum sampler. Has some > "live" features... but still focused on drums. > > 2. Those that shed the emphasis on drums and see Hydrogen > as a comprehensive music application for > live-performance sequencing, sampling, and looping. > > What do you guys think about this? > > -gabriel ho, sorry, i know here is no float allowed. but i vote definitely 1,75. . why: 1. keep the simple to use interface 2. all new extended functions which give h2 more power and flexibly, can be available decent in background. as i said in my previous mail. a good example here is the tracker renoise. really much and useful functions to make mostly "tracking" super flexible and usable on many different ways. this is my vision from hydrogen. so i vote 75% for your vision 2. and 25% for vision 1. to keep the intuitive interface and hold the product-description ( Hydrogen is an advanced "drum machine"... ). greetings wolke ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Hydrogen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hydrogen-devel
