On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 23:42, Yu Shao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Right now, the four Asian locales' definition in X are:
>
> zh_CN.UTF-8 locale is using en_US.UTF-8's definition,
> zh_TW.UTF-8 is using zh_TW.UTF-8
> ko_KR.UTF-8 is using ko_KR.UTF-8
> ja_JP.UTF-8 is using ja_JP.UTF-8
>
> Actually the detailed definitions for these four, are exactly the same
> except some fs ordering difference due to their similarities in nature,
> also thinking about our goal is to define one common UTF-8 locale
> ultimately, can we combine these above four locales first? It would be
> easy to maintain them. Any comments?
Keeping them separate makes sense to me ... the fs ordering
changes are intentional and it doesn't seem that the maintainence
costs are very high for having them separate.
(As discussed elsewhere, the fs ordering needs to be fixed for
at least ja_JP.UTF-8, since it currently looks for ISO-10646-1
fonts before JIS encoded fonts.)
Regards,
Owen
_______________________________________________
I18n mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/i18n
