Hi Jean, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:20:13 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> This patch corrects some minor typos. The term "below" in these paragraphs >> might also be replaced by "later" or something similar? > You're right, this is a remnant from the times where all the i2c > options were in a single menu. Nowadays, 'under "I2C Hardware Bus > support"' would be more appropriate. Or... nothing at all. After all, > the i2c "algorithm" modules are selected automatically whenever a > driver that relies on them is selected. They are visible in the menu > only so that one can enable them for an hypothetical out-of-tree driver > - but I doubt that this is terribly useful. So a 3rd option would be to > simply remove these items from the configuration menu. I support the idea of removing them. If there is an out-of-tree driver, it will find a way to set the algorithm from outside. Shall I make such a patch, if there are no further objections?
-- Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
