On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:47:11 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:20:13 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> This patch corrects some minor typos. The term "below" in these paragraphs > >> might also be replaced by "later" or something similar? > > You're right, this is a remnant from the times where all the i2c > > options were in a single menu. Nowadays, 'under "I2C Hardware Bus > > support"' would be more appropriate. Or... nothing at all. After all, > > the i2c "algorithm" modules are selected automatically whenever a > > driver that relies on them is selected. They are visible in the menu > > only so that one can enable them for an hypothetical out-of-tree driver > > - but I doubt that this is terribly useful. So a 3rd option would be to > > simply remove these items from the configuration menu. > > I support the idea of removing them. If there is an out-of-tree driver, > it will find a way to set the algorithm from outside. Shall I make such > a patch, if there are no further objections?
I will send such a patch later today. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
