Hi wolfram,

I can help test this of cuz, yet I have a few questions:

1. what's the exact reason of moving the i2c->adap.nr assignment to the
begining, it looks this is unnecessary since I didn't find any dependency
of the following code on i2c->adap.nr ??

2. the remaining changes looks good, so they are clean up right? instead
of trying to fix something

- eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean Delvare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 4:59 PM
> To: Wolfram Sang
> Cc: [email protected]; Mike Rapoport; Eric Miao
> Subject: Re: [i2c] [patch 6/6] Minor fixes for pxa-driver
> 
> Hi Wolfram,
> 
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:20:16 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > While working on the PCA9564-platform driver, I sometimes had a glimpse at
> the
> > pxa-driver. I found some suspicious places, and this patch contains my
> > suggestions. Note: They are not tested, due to no hardware.
> 
> Looks good. I've added a couple more fixes, resulting patch is below.
> As I don't have hardware for testing either, I would appreciate if
> someone with a PXA board could test it and confirm that it causes no
> regression. Mike? Eric? I plan to send this patch to Linus for 2.6.25
> (i.e. quickly.)
> 
> From: Wolfram Sang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: i2c-pxa: Misc fixes
> 
> While working on the PCA9564-platform driver, I sometimes had a glimpse at the
> pxa-driver. I found some suspicious places, and this patch contains my
> suggestions. Note: They are not tested, due to no hardware.
> 
> [JD: Some more fixes.]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c |   27 +++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux-2.6.25-rc1.orig/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c        2008-02-13
> 09:51:09.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.25-rc1/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c     2008-02-13
> 09:57:33.000000000 +0100
> @@ -997,7 +997,14 @@ static int i2c_pxa_probe(struct platform
>       spin_lock_init(&i2c->lock);
>       init_waitqueue_head(&i2c->wait);
> 
> -     sprintf(i2c->adap.name, "pxa_i2c-i2c.%u", dev->id);
> +     /*
> +      * If "dev->id" is negative we consider it as zero.
> +      * The reason to do so is to avoid sysfs names that only make
> +      * sense when there are multiple adapters.
> +      */
> +     i2c->adap.nr = dev->id != -1 ? dev->id : 0;
> +     snprintf(i2c->adap.name, sizeof(i2c->adap.name), "pxa_i2c-i2c.%u",
> +              i2c->adap.nr);
> 
>       i2c->clk = clk_get(&dev->dev, "I2CCLK");
>       if (IS_ERR(i2c->clk)) {
> @@ -1048,13 +1055,6 @@ static int i2c_pxa_probe(struct platform
>       i2c->adap.algo_data = i2c;
>       i2c->adap.dev.parent = &dev->dev;
> 
> -     /*
> -      * If "dev->id" is negative we consider it as zero.
> -      * The reason to do so is to avoid sysfs names that only make
> -      * sense when there are multiple adapters.
> -      */
> -     i2c->adap.nr = dev->id != -1 ? dev->id : 0;
> -
>       ret = i2c_add_numbered_adapter(&i2c->adap);
>       if (ret < 0) {
>               printk(KERN_INFO "I2C: Failed to add bus\n");
> @@ -1078,6 +1078,7 @@ eadapt:
>  ereqirq:
>       clk_disable(i2c->clk);
>       i2c_pxa_disable(dev);
> +     iounmap(i2c->reg_base);
>  eremap:
>       clk_put(i2c->clk);
>  eclk:
> @@ -1087,7 +1088,7 @@ emalloc:
>       return ret;
>  }
> 
> -static int i2c_pxa_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
> +static int __devexit i2c_pxa_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
>  {
>       struct pxa_i2c *i2c = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
> 
> @@ -1101,6 +1102,7 @@ static int i2c_pxa_remove(struct platfor
>       clk_put(i2c->clk);
>       i2c_pxa_disable(dev);
> 
> +     iounmap(i2c->reg_base);
>       release_mem_region(i2c->iobase, i2c->iosize);
>       kfree(i2c);
> 
> @@ -1109,9 +1111,10 @@ static int i2c_pxa_remove(struct platfor
> 
>  static struct platform_driver i2c_pxa_driver = {
>       .probe          = i2c_pxa_probe,
> -     .remove         = i2c_pxa_remove,
> +     .remove         = __devexit_p(i2c_pxa_remove),
>       .driver         = {
>               .name   = "pxa2xx-i2c",
> +             .owner  = THIS_DRIVER,
>       },
>  };
> 
> @@ -1120,9 +1123,9 @@ static int __init i2c_adap_pxa_init(void
>       return platform_driver_register(&i2c_pxa_driver);
>  }
> 
> -static void i2c_adap_pxa_exit(void)
> +static void __exit i2c_adap_pxa_exit(void)
>  {
> -     return platform_driver_unregister(&i2c_pxa_driver);
> +     platform_driver_unregister(&i2c_pxa_driver);
>  }
> 
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> 
> --
> Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c

Reply via email to