On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:47:14 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi Jean, > > I have a new approach for the isp1301 driver, took your idea > of adding a new irq_flags member to i2c_boardinfo and i2c_client.
I said we could do this _if_ many drivers needed this field. I didn't mean to do it right now... So far I only know of the isp1301 driver which would need this. And at any rate I'd like to hear David's opinion before adding a new field to the core i2c structures. > If it's ok for you, i'll also send a patch putting linux-omap and > linux-mailine isp1301 in sync. This would be great, yes. Divergence between trees tend to confuse developers, often I receive patches which do not apply to my tree because of this. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
