HI Ed, I would be happy to address your concerns and/or incorporate new ideas you may have into the draft as we proceed in the WG. We would definitely take suggestions about the content and way to express requirements.
Regards, Rakesh From: I2nsf <[email protected]> on behalf of "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 11:41 AM To: Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Call for WG adoption of draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req I am good with the framework, but I have reservations on the functional and operational requirements. I'm good to adopt this as a WG document, in the intent that we need to focus our effort on this, but I'm not comfortable with the content in its current state - Ed On 9/21/2016 at 1:55 PM, "Linda Dunbar" <[email protected]> wrote: Dear WG: This email serves as a call for WG adoption of draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req as a WG document. The call for adoption will run for 2 weeks ending Oct 5, 2016. The requirement document is one of the key deliverables specified by the I2NSF charter. Please note that this is a call for adoption, and not a last call for content of the document. Adopting a WG document simply means that the WG will focus its efforts on that particular draft going forward, and use that document for resolving open issues and documenting the WG’s decisions. Please indicate whether you support adoption for not, and if not why. Issues you have with the current document itself can also be raised, but they should be raised in the context of what should be changed in the document going forward, rather than a pre-condition for adoption. Finally, now is also a good time to poll for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, in line with the IPR disclosure obligations for WG participants (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author please respond to this email (to the chairs) whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req-00.txt Authors: there are some editorial changes needed to comply with the I2NSF terminologies that the WG has agreed, in particular: - Abstract: needs to change the starting sentence to “This document provides a framework and requirement ….” - Change all reference of “North Bound Interface” to “Client/consumer facing interface”. Thank you, Linda & Adrian
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
