And what about “tenant or “user" rather than “customer”? Be goode,
On 17 Oct 2016, at 22:28 , Linda Dunbar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: John, Maybe we should call it “customer-facing-interface” instead of “consumer-facing-interface”? Linda From: I2nsf [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 3:23 PM To: John Strassner <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [I2nsf] Definition for "Consumer" in I2NSF terminology , in the context of "Client Facing Interface" John, There are two types of interface described in I2NSF framework: - one is NSF facing interface, over which rules or policies can be expressed based on ports/IP addresses for packets traversing through a NSF; - another is the interface for Clients, users, tenants, to express/query rules that are expressed in users own ID, address domains, etc. Commonly called “Client facing interface”. You have suggested to use “Consumer facing Interface”. But the definition of “Consumer” in I2NSF Terminology -01, doesn’t really reflect the idea of rules being expressed from the perspective of clients or users. If we use this terminology, “Consumer” interface can also face NSFs as well. Consumer: A Consumer is a Role that is assigned to an I2NSF Component that can receive information from another I2NSF Component. See also: Provider, Role. Can you clarify ? Thanks, Linda _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf -- "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno" Dr Diego R. Lopez Telefonica I+D http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/ e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +34 913 129 041 Mobile: +34 682 051 091 ----------------------------------
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
