Thanks to all who replied. 

The response was overwhelmingly positive, so we judge that there is consensus 
for adoption.

Standard question for draft authors: Are you all willing to continue editing 
this document?  We will assume the answer is yes; please reply to the list or 
to the chairs privately otherwise.

Assuming you all are still on-board, please resubmit the latest version as 
draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-00.

Thank you for the effort

Linda & Yoav

> On 7 Apr 2018, at 1:20, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>  
> The authors of I2NSF capability YANG Data Model 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-capability-data-model/ 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-capability-data-model/> 
> have requested working group adoption of this draft.  The Capability data 
> model is one of the deliverables of I2NSF WG, which is used by Registration 
> interface and NSF interface.
>  
> Please bear in mind that WG Adoption doesn’t mean that the draft current 
> content is ready, WG Adoption only means that it is a good basis for a 
> working group to work on..
>  
> While all feedback is helpful, comments pro or con with explanations are much 
> more helpful than just "yes please" or "no thank you".
>  
> Thank you. 
>  
> Linda & Yoav
>  
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>
_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

Reply via email to