Hi!
Thank you for all of the edits on draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm
which largely resolved IESG feedback.
I'm going to ask for few more editorial fixes:
(1) (from idnits)
-- The abstract seems to contain references
([I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model]), which it shouldn't. Please
replace those with straight textual mentions of the documents in question.
I response to IESG feedback I believe a reference was added into the abstract.
Please revert to the earlier text which had not reference.
-- Outdated reference: draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location has been published as
RFC 9179
(2) In response to Éric Vyncke's ballot, references to an information model
were removed. There is one more place in the introduction to Section 4 where
this still needs to be done.
I've advanced the document to "Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D
Needed".
Again, thanks for all of the work here.
Roman
_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
