Hi Paul! Thanks for this last update on this document too. I’ve advanced it for publication.
Congratulations and thanks for the hard work. Roman From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2022 5:38 AM To: Roman Danyliw <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; skku-iotlab-members <[email protected]>; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Post IESG feedback on draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-26 Hi Roman, I have reflected your comments on the revision of the I2NSF NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-27#page-80 Thanks. Best Regards, Paul On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 5:16 AM Roman Danyliw <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi! Thank you for all of the edits on draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm which largely resolved IESG feedback. I'm going to ask for few more editorial fixes: (1) (from idnits) -- The abstract seems to contain references ([I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model]), which it shouldn't. Please replace those with straight textual mentions of the documents in question. I response to IESG feedback I believe a reference was added into the abstract. Please revert to the earlier text which had not reference. -- Outdated reference: draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location has been published as RFC 9179 (2) In response to Éric Vyncke's ballot, references to an information model were removed. There is one more place in the introduction to Section 4 where this still needs to be done. I've advanced the document to "Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed". Again, thanks for all of the work here. Roman _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
