For an overview of information and data models (and the distinction between 
them), there is also RFC 3444 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3444.txt

Just as a comment, I like the pyang-ish data tree as a summary of the model 
structure as well. A short-hand for some of the "cornerstones" of the model, 
then more specifics can be found in the more formal definition.  I would think 
what is currently there should provide more or lesswhat is needed, hence I'd 
hope the group would be able to just reuse that (building any extensions on top 
if and when needed, but not introducing a new variation).

Kind regards
--- Alex


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alia 
Atlas
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [i2rs] format for information models

As part of  the proposed i2rs charter, the WG would need to produce information 
models.  I know there's
lots of interest in this and it would be great to agree on a format that we'd 
like to see the information models
in.

>From my perspective (learning all the time), an information model is to 
>describe the information and purpose
of the data needed in the model, without all the details that make the 
reasoning and structure hard to understand
(and also take lots of time to develop).  Of course, there's Wikipedia's 
definition (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_model)
and various RFCs that include information models (RFC 5102, 3585, etc).  
Frequently, the information model
can just be in English.

Based on some side conversations, I'd like to see if we can discuss and agree 
on a format to try for the information
models.  What I'd suggest is basically a data-tree (similar to the TreeOutput 
from pyang - seen at
http://code.google.com/p/pyang/wiki/TreeOutput) and then information per data 
item.  The required information would
be a description, a type, and, if appropriate, a reference (to where else the 
concept is defined).

What do you all think?  Any better/different ideas?

Alia
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to