On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:58:19PM +0000, Adrian Farrel wrote: > Information provided without comment... > > draft-ietf-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis has approached the problem of an > information model without a modelling language. I think the problem it is > solving is simpler than in I2RS. >
RFC 5102 and RFC 5102bis are in my view not good example for information models. They essentially defines some core data types and the mechanisms to define derived data types, called 'Information Elements' in IPFIX. The core of IPFIX does not even know about structured data types (RFC 6313 added this capability). So yes, the problem IPFIX initially addressed was rather simple. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
