Juergen, What would you recommend for an information model for i2rs?
Alia On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < [email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:58:19PM +0000, Adrian Farrel wrote: > > Information provided without comment... > > > > draft-ietf-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis has approached the problem > of an > > information model without a modelling language. I think the problem it is > > solving is simpler than in I2RS. > > > > RFC 5102 and RFC 5102bis are in my view not good example for > information models. They essentially defines some core data types and > the mechanisms to define derived data types, called 'Information > Elements' in IPFIX. The core of IPFIX does not even know about > structured data types (RFC 6313 added this capability). So yes, the > problem IPFIX initially addressed was rather simple. > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> >
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
