Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 05:59:12PM -0500, Russ White wrote: >> Y'all: >> >> Because of a long and protracted exchange off list with a number of >> folks, I've come to the conclusion that we can't (really) start with a >> data model --even working from the use cases to a data model seems to be >> difficult. I think we need to come to agreement on what a router looks >> like first. >> >> No, not blue, grey, green, or... :-) >> >> Look at the attached (hopefully the attachment works --if not, I've >> stashed a copy here, as well: http://www.riw.us/temp/router%20model.jpg). >> > > Whatever the model is, I would hope that it is consistent with what we > already have in this document: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-09
Yes, I2RS folks, please have a look. The scope of the NETMOD routing model seems to fit Russ's description in that it also aims at the same locations A, B, C. There are some differences in terminology but these shouldn't be insurmountable. If you have any comments or suggestions regarding the NETMOD data model, please let us know asap because that I-D is already overdue. Thanks, Lada > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
