> Thanks for the clarifications. I am still a little fuzzy about what you mean > by "...B to represent modifications to the policy the > routing process uses to choose which route to present to the RIB." To use an > example from BGP, maybe this could mean configuring an inbound prefix list or > other type of policy filter. If so, then B is an interface to change the > configuration of the routing protocol rather than the data (e.g., Adj-RIB-In > contents), right? Of course, this type of configuration change affects not > only what the protocol sends to the RIB, but may also affect what the > protocol readvertises to its neighbors.
Communities within BGP, for instance, or the metric on an OSPF route. Yes, link state protocols would have fewer of these than BGP would --but I think a good bit of the BGP policy model Shane wants would fit here... (?). :-) Russ _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
