Looking again at this document, I have to reluctantly say taht I do not
support adoption of this document at this time.
The base definition of RIB is still very unclear. A RIB is some
collection of routing instances? First, this seems upside-down to me.
A routing instance would seem to contain a RIB, not the other way
around. Secondly, what defines, describes, or otherwise helps decide
what set of routing instances go in the same RIB.
If this issue were clarified, I believe the rest of the material is in
sufficiently good shape for working group adoption.
Yours,
Joel M. Halpern
On 7/24/13 5:55 PM, Alia Atlas wrote:
Please review draft-nitinb-i2rs-rib-info-model-01 and comment on whether
it should be adopted by I2RS. Detailed technical conversation is also
most welcome.
Authors: Are you aware of any IPR that applies
to draft-nitinb-i2rs-rib-info-model-01 Is so, has this IPR been
disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
and 5378 for more details).
This WG call for adoption will complete on August 12.
Thanks,
Alia
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
