> Carlos, good point. But we also need to ask the question of where we > express relationships between routing-contexts. E.g. If VPN-1 is being > transported over Backbone-1 and VPN-2 over Backbone-2. Would these be > inside the routing context or in a top level object ?
So you're saying, "what if 10.1.1.0/24 in context 1 is reachable via 10.1.1.1 in context 2?" The primary way we describe this today is through tunneling, not through multiple VRF contexts... And I would never expect to have, "(10.1.1.0/24,context1) is reachable via (10.1.1.1,context2), and (192.168.1.0/24,context2) is reachable via (10.1.1.1,context1)." In fact, I think all such situations are probably really dangerous in the real world, and operators would avoid them like the plague. But, again, I'm not saying this is a completely nonuseful construct, I'm just trying to figure out a specific use case for doing such a thing. :-) Russ _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
