On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Andy Bierman <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think Jan and others have explained why they think they can leverage > the NC/RC/YANG technology to implement I2RS. There are tool > and data model management requirements in addition to the protocol > in order to have a workable solution. > > Unless the RIB data is one monolithic blob implemented without > variation on every router, then issues such as modularity, conformance > model, data lifecycle, distributed naming authority, data augmentation, > and language extensibility are going to matter. >
So lets put all that in a requirement list somewhere and work around a gap analysis. cheers, jamal _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
