Benoit, On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:43:35PM +0200, Benoit Claise wrote: > The least we can say is that the WG is late.
Indeed. :-) > I observe that after 1 year and 3 months after the WG creation, we > still don't have the problem statement/architecture/requirements: I've been told that we should see an update to the architecture and problem statement soon. The intention is to push for final review in WGLC to get that work completed. The requirements are, in many cases, covered in the various use case documents. Sue has volunteered to try to excerpt the common requirements from the documents she's shepherding to derive a common requirements set. A space has been set aside on the WG wiki for this. Please feel free to help populate it: http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/i2rs/trac/wiki/UseCaseRequirementsEnumeration -- Jeff _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
