On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:49:21AM -0400, Susan Hares wrote: > I'm trying to get a workable alternative to RBNF to discuss the actual > im-tree. UML is best, but I'm not sure If I can it in the documents. 5 > pages of UML covers all the RIB models. UML tools can create yang data > models and forces (In my understanding). However, some human beings seem > to need the yang tree models to see the tree and links to yang.
I assume people mean UML class diagrams when they say UML. That said, yes tools can turn UML into other stuff. However, whether the result is 'nice' or 'implementable are reasonable pain' is a different question (and I understand that 'nice' and 'pain' have no clear definition). UML class diagrams allow the representation of arbitrary relationships between classes. If you have to turn this into a hierarchy for a protocol using a hierarchical namespace, then tools most likely only create _a_ solution not a _good_ solution. If you believe tools do a good job translating IMs to DMs, you will likely soon find that this is generally not the case and in order to make it work better you will start to augment you IM with lots of additional detail for the translator to do a reasonably good job, in which case your IM deteriorates to some extend into a DM. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
