> >IMHO your RIB functionality is insufficient as it stands because it >doesn't >contain the SRC-DST lookup using the packet + Meta data. RIBs should be >able to match on the SRC-DST for all types of routes. > >I see we have a different view on the functions of look-ups. This is a >terrific discussion on the RIB-Info functionality. Let's try to decide on >this point, and then go back to grammar second. Will that work for you?
Yupwe have a different view. Looking forward to see what views the rest of WG has. Thanks Nitin _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
