Nitin: To make the discussion it easier, can you release a new version of the clean-up RBNF grammar? Even a post of your clean-up would help me not miss something in our discussions.
Sue -----Original Message----- From: Nitin Bahadur [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 4:28 PM To: Susan Hares; [email protected] Subject: Re: [i2rs] Some comments on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-01 > >IMHO your RIB functionality is insufficient as it stands because it >doesn't contain the SRC-DST lookup using the packet + Meta data. RIBs >should be able to match on the SRC-DST for all types of routes. > >I see we have a different view on the functions of look-ups. This is a >terrific discussion on the RIB-Info functionality. Let's try to decide >on this point, and then go back to grammar second. Will that work for you? YupŠwe have a different view. Looking forward to see what views the rest of WG has. Thanks Nitin _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
