Jeff: Problem statement: read, suggested changes (repeated 4X), Ok for WG LC, and RFC. Architecture document: wrote, edited other people changes (repeated 10X), Ok for WG LC, RFC.
Documents ready to ship to IESG for blessed RFCdom. Thanks Jeff for the reminder to comment! Sue -----Original Message----- From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 4:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [i2rs] Working Group Last Call on architecture and problem statement drafts (redux) Working Group, The original deadline for comments on WGLC for the problem statement and architecture drafts of May 30 has passed with no comment whatsoever. While we all realize that there's a bit of exhaustion going on with regard to these drafts, they are a bit of process we simply must get done in order to fully move forward with our agenda of putting together data models. We are *NOT* going to hold that work up further - it is clear that there is consenus to start making that progress. To assist us with putting this work behind us, please respond to the following questions: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement/ Have you read the problem statement draft? Do you think it is ready to be published as a RFC? (If no, please respond to the list with issues.) http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-architecture/ Have you read the architecture draft? Do you think it is ready to be published as a RFC? (Ditto.) -- Jeff _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
