On 6/6/14, 10:10 AM, Alia Atlas wrote:
Dean,

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Dean Bogdanovic <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Jeff,

    Problem statement:  suggested changes, several times, still waiting
    for those to be addressed in the draft. As my comments are not
    addressed, I don't think draft is ready for WGLC or RFC.


Just a reminder - I have the changes ready to go as discussed.  We were
waiting on any other comments from the WGLC before updating the draft.
  Given the paucity of such comments and the
availability of integers, I'll just submit it.

I also had some comments on the last architecture draft. While some of them were silently addressed, there were a couple where I expected the authors to respond. I can resend the email if you missed it. It was a while ago.

Joe


Alia

    Architecture document: ready for WGLC, ready for RFC

    Dean

    On Jun 5, 2014, at 4:29 PM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

     > Working Group,
     >
     > The original deadline for comments on WGLC for the problem
    statement and
     > architecture drafts of May 30 has passed with no comment whatsoever.
     >
     > While we all realize that there's a bit of exhaustion going on
    with regard
     > to these drafts, they are a bit of process we simply must get
    done in order
     > to fully move forward with our agenda of putting together data
    models.
     >
     > We are *NOT* going to hold that work up further - it is clear
    that there is
     > consenus to start making that progress.
     >
     > To assist us with putting this work behind us, please respond to the
     > following questions:
     >
     > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement/
     > Have you read the problem statement draft?
     > Do you think it is ready to be published as a RFC?
     > (If no, please respond to the list with issues.)
     >
     > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-architecture/
     > Have you read the architecture draft?
     > Do you think it is ready to be published as a RFC?
     > (Ditto.)
     >
     > -- Jeff
     >
     > _______________________________________________
     > i2rs mailing list
     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

    _______________________________________________
    i2rs mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs




_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs


_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to